<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8216;Ghostbusters&#8217; Director Paul Feig Calls Sexist Backlash &#8220;The Death Throes Of The Old Guard&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/34062-20160621/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/34062-20160621/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: SnarkySkunk		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/34062-20160621/#comment-26218</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SnarkySkunk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.net/?p=34062#comment-26218</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Uhm... I appreciate your progressive leaning here, I really do, but not everybody that &#039;protests&#039; this is a sexist. There are far too many dislikes on these YouTube trailers for that to be true. The movie just doesn&#039;t look good. I&#039;m holding out for reviews like the rest of you, but I can&#039;t imagine how that footage fits into a good film, regardless of the gender of its lead characters. I was behind this film, I was hyped at the casting news, I was loving the early teaser images as they dribbled out... The trailers squandered all that good will. That reaction doesn&#039;t make me a chauvinist pig. It just makes me a discerning film viewer.

Why does this matter? Well because when you have an agenda to push, it taints your credibility. You&#039;re condemning a straw man group for this while committing the same mistake by giving this thing the benefit of the doubt before it&#039;s even out and quoting heavily from the people behind its promotional campaign. You&#039;ve all but painted yourself into a corner where you have to praise this film because of what is represents, and that&#039;s really going to be ugly if it turns out to be subpar or even bad. It&#039;s best to stay impartial in these things, otherwise you&#039;ll be going to war with your own integrity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhm&#8230; I appreciate your progressive leaning here, I really do, but not everybody that &#8216;protests&#8217; this is a sexist. There are far too many dislikes on these YouTube trailers for that to be true. The movie just doesn&#8217;t look good. I&#8217;m holding out for reviews like the rest of you, but I can&#8217;t imagine how that footage fits into a good film, regardless of the gender of its lead characters. I was behind this film, I was hyped at the casting news, I was loving the early teaser images as they dribbled out&#8230; The trailers squandered all that good will. That reaction doesn&#8217;t make me a chauvinist pig. It just makes me a discerning film viewer.</p>
<p>Why does this matter? Well because when you have an agenda to push, it taints your credibility. You&#8217;re condemning a straw man group for this while committing the same mistake by giving this thing the benefit of the doubt before it&#8217;s even out and quoting heavily from the people behind its promotional campaign. You&#8217;ve all but painted yourself into a corner where you have to praise this film because of what is represents, and that&#8217;s really going to be ugly if it turns out to be subpar or even bad. It&#8217;s best to stay impartial in these things, otherwise you&#8217;ll be going to war with your own integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
