<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 12 Movies To See In August	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/12-movies-to-see-in-august-20170801/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/12-movies-to-see-in-august-20170801/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2017 17:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: jh		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/12-movies-to-see-in-august-20170801/#comment-155064</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2017 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.net/?p=370301#comment-155064</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s odd to call an article &#039;12 films to see in August&#039;, and then include a film (Death Note) which you go on to trash sight unseen. Why list it under an article &#039;films to see&#039; if you don&#039;t think it&#039;s going to be worth seeing? And - more importantly I suppose - how can you trash it if you haven’t even seen it (although you write about it as though you have: &#039;Not even LaKeith Stanfield is enough to bring this writer to sit through this mess&#039; etc)? How do you know it&#039;s a mess, you haven&#039;t even seen it! I really enjoy this site, but this feels a little below the belt.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s odd to call an article &#8217;12 films to see in August&#8217;, and then include a film (Death Note) which you go on to trash sight unseen. Why list it under an article &#8216;films to see&#8217; if you don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s going to be worth seeing? And &#8211; more importantly I suppose &#8211; how can you trash it if you haven’t even seen it (although you write about it as though you have: &#8216;Not even LaKeith Stanfield is enough to bring this writer to sit through this mess&#8217; etc)? How do you know it&#8217;s a mess, you haven&#8217;t even seen it! I really enjoy this site, but this feels a little below the belt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
